The recent comment by one of our undercover correspondents on the Rohrschach article is far too amazing to let it languish in the comments section. Read on:

I see why it had to “be brought to your attention”, its hardly but more than a shadow. I’m assuming the whole Freudian psychoanalyst school of thought he followed manifested from his acute awareness regarding his physiological failure to grow a proper moustache, leaving him very troubled and confused about the nature of reality, which resulted in the creation of inkblot tests that can clearly be  interrupted with the modern eye of moustached individuals as an expression of facial hair envy that propelled his crack-pottery- I am in concurrence in your observation of the uncanny resemblance of his inkblot and the moustache, and would further assert that he was mistaken in claiming his inkblots were designs to be interpreted by others, when in fact they were creations of his own hand in which he clearly constructed each one in the likeness of a moustache that he did not have. They were all moustaches. Of course, his failure to grow a proper moustache would naturally have meant he was not popular with the ladies, thereby fueling his ‘sexual frustration’ theories that followed, further propelling his agreement with Freud. But this aspect was simply a by-product stemming from his lack of moustache. The story of Rhorschach is but the  tragedy of an idle life which succumbs to confusion and idiocy in the face of denial regarding their lack of moustache hair. Let this be a lesson to all: Be wary of the man who lacks a moustache.
Good day.
T